Saturday, April 24, 2010

Heathers

Before this class I had never seen or really heard anything about the film Heathers. I had heard of the film, but had no idea what it was about and figured it would be a typical 1980’s film concerning teenagers growing up in a cliquey high school. While Heathers was without a doubt filled with these temporal and Hughes-like narrative elements, the film was definitely not what I was expecting. While I did like the film for it’s often clever satire regarding the topic of teen suicide, I couldn’t get over the unbelievable nature of the story, the corny dialogue and, more than anything else, Winona Ryder. Those somewhat biased judgments aside, I did think that Heathers was an interesting film and was, like many films we’ve watched this semester, a unique and entertaining experience.

The film opens with three girls, all named Heather, playing croquet in someone’s backyard. As the three girls play their game, it is eventually revealed to the audience that they are aiming at another girl, Veronica, who is buried up to her neck in the yard. From the very start, the film establishes itself aesthetically, stylistically and thematically. The images are filled with vibrant reds, yellows and greens (the colors of the girls’ clothes which curiously match their croquet equipment). The color pallet does not appear to be cohesive. Rather it simply bursts with vibrancy for the sake of being colorful and flashy, much like a lot of 1980’s fashion. The film also establishes itself as being comedic, its first scene ending in a way that we would never have expected. More than anything else, the theme of the film is introduced to us through the way the girls behave, particularly the way they treat Veronica. Although we soon find out that Veronica is part of the group, she is in a way being initiated, often being forced into doing things that she doesn’t want to do. We soon see that this is a film that concerns itself with popularity and where teenagers find themselves fitting in throughout high school, whether it is their choice or not.

As the film progresses, it attempts to bring us into this exaggerated portrayal of high school life by including stereotypical groups of people. In a scene early on in the film, as the three Heathers and Veronica walk around the cafeteria, we are introduced to the unattractive outsider, Martha “Dumptruck”, the sexually charged jocks, Kurt and Ram, the nerds, the proactive preppy students trying to raise money for different foundations, and the rebel, Jason Dean (played by Christian Slater and an obvious reference to the 1950’s “rebel” James Dean). It is the character of Jason Dean that completely changes Heathers and is the most intriguing aspect of the film to me.

In Nick Burns article “Heathers: Scent of Dominance”, he mentions the similarities between Christian Slater and Jack Nicholson. “…Christian Slater’s performance as J.D. easily can be seen merely as a parody/ pastiche of many early Jack Nicholson roles: the tilt of his head, the eyebrows, and even the nasal voice….” With not only his name being referential, but his character as well (for Nicholson, in roles like Easy Rider and Five Easy Pieces, was often a symbol of rebellious and dominating behavior), we begin to see that the character is nothing more than a recycling of previous figures, now slightly turned on its head by making him completely psychotic. The fact that Slater’s character is being recycled brings up the idea that we discussed of Post Modernism.

At one point, Burns mentions in his article that, “Heathers is clearly the bastard child of Hollywood Cinema,” and is “full of empty references to pop culture.” As we watch Heathers, we realize that it is not a film meant to transport us to another place or time. Rather it attempts to bring us into this exaggerated version of our own world, filling it with as many cultural references as possible (previous films, musicians, societal issues and historical events) in order to make it seem like the absurdity of the film can actually be found in our everyday lives.

5 comments:

  1. I really would of liked to hear about what you thought about the post modern discussion as you brought it up at the end there but did not fully address it. You don't really get at any of the underlying stuff in your post, which you usually do, and I wonder if the familiarity with high school set movies triggers us to encase the environment and not allow it to spill over into other aspects of our society?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought the 'empty references' in this film also worked to highlight the shallowness of these high school students and their lives. The article talks about how world hunger, racial problems, and anorexia are just a couple of the topics brought up and then immediately dropped within the first scene, and I thought that showed how these truly large problems are trivial within this film and to these characters. I know this isn't exactly the case with the pop culture references, but just saying :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree, I thought that the many empty references in the movie really were a nice compliment to how shallow and materialistic most people were and a lot of high schoolers are. Sorry to basically restate what you wrote above. I agree the dialogue was so corny but hilarious at times. I do think the film exaggerated high school life at times but I have seen and heard some of the things that happened in the movie while I was in high school. It's always a pleasure reading your blogs!

    ReplyDelete
  4. its great to see that you also brought up the color pallet that was used in this film. I tried to figure out what was going on with that but only got to the point that it had to do with the pecking order...red being the top color. In that same paragraph you mentioned how it was comedic at points but didn't expect it because of the plot. i was also in shock when watching, totally didn't think it was going to go that way. i would have to agree with the class discussion in that aspect saying that it was shocking because of the seriousness of shootings in our generation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. People don't often talk about the fact that the whole flat 80s glossy surface of blank style mocking your attempts to find meaning or substance or reference can be kind of jarring. It's a style that's as morally blank and funny as the mean but funny kids at school, but at the same time so pretty you keep watching it. Movies like this are stylistically exactly the same as mean popular kids. It's a mean popular style. It doesn't care about you. It's...postmodern!

    ReplyDelete